Reported after looking at the step: the add button unstyled, the dialog missing
the fields a backup location actually has, and its dropdowns not working. Three
real faults, and one reason all three shipped.
* "+ Add destination" carried class .setup-add-domain, which I invented. The
real one is .setup-domain-add, so no rule matched and it rendered as a bare
browser button in the middle of a styled form.
* The dialog asked for name / type / host / user / path / password. A backup
location has SSH port and auth method (key or password — key is the default
and needs nothing typed), S3 access and secret keys, B2 account id and key,
and a path mode. It now asks for what each backend needs, with the wording
taken from the location config so the wizard and the Backup page describe
the same thing the same way.
* .setup-field styled input[type=text] and [type=email] but not [type=password]
or [type=number], so a credential field and the SSH port rendered unstyled
even inside a correct container.
Only the credentials go through the secret channel — SSH password, S3 secret
key, B2 account key. The rest is ordinary configuration and travels as itself.
The reason all three shipped is that I checked the step by querying the DOM and
never looked at it. Structural checks cannot see an unstyled control, and a
dialog is behind a click so a screenshot cannot reach it either. So:
lp-shot --eval <route> <js> run JS in the page and print the result
LP_SHOT_EVAL=<js> run JS before a capture — open a dialog, then shoot
and scripts/dev/lp-backup-dialog-test drives the whole thing in a real browser:
opens it, swaps every backend and asserts only that backend's fields show,
toggles SSH auth and asserts the password field follows, submits, and asserts
the credential is not left in the DOM.
Its styling check needed two attempts, which is the point of mutation-testing
it: "is the background transparent" passes for an unstyled button, because a
native button is grey rather than transparent. It now compares the control
against a bare <button> in the same parent, so "no rule matched" is what fails.
Verified: reintroducing the wrong class fails the test.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
00114a6ce2