11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
librelad
d0735ea9ba docs: first-run restore generates new secrets over a backup holding the old ones
Restoring a real 13-app repository onto a fresh install: 11 came back working.
matrix failed because its install hook writes homeserver.yaml with the new DB
secret and the restore then lays the old one back over it; stoat failed because
rabbit's mnesia dir restores raw and the broker only honours
RABBITMQ_DEFAULT_PASS on an empty data dir.

Apps with a dump descriptor are unaffected — those clear the data dir so the
engine initialises with the current secret, then replay the dump. That is the
tell for what the general fix has to look like.

Not implemented: applying the restored system config on first run changes what a
restore does with credentials (including the WebUI login), which is a decision,
not a defect. Written up as §3.6 with a recommendation.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-28 06:50:57 +01:00
librelad
17316b7fe2 backup: restore ownership through a multi-range userns map
grafana restored and then died with "attempt to write a readonly database",
repeatedly. Its database is recorded in the snapshot as 231543:1002 and landed
as 1002:1002 — the owner was lost, so grafana, running as 231543, could not
write it at mode 0640.

Restore runs as the backup user with no CAP_CHOWN, so it reinstates ownership
inside a user namespace. The prefix was

    unshare --map-root-user --map-users=SUB:SUB:N --map-groups=SUB:SUB:N

and unshare accepts ONE range per option, so the backup user's own GID was never
mapped — while app data is written as <container-uid>:<backup-user>. The group
half of every such chown referred to an unmapped id, lchown returned EINVAL, and
the file kept the restoring user's ownership. restic reports those as "ignoring
error ..." and still exits 0, so nothing failed: 1626 of one 13-app restore's
2086 failed chowns were grafana's, under a restore that reported success.

restic-userns-exec uses newuidmap/newgidmap, which write the multi-range maps
unshare cannot express:

    uid:  0       <- caller     inner root, or caps are dropped at exec
          SUB..   <- SUB..      identity, so restic can name the stored uid
    gid:  caller  <- caller     identity: the group half of app-data chowns
          SUB..   <- SUB..      identity

The caller's own UID is deliberately not identity-mapped — that slot is spent on
inner root — and a file stored as <caller>:<caller> lands owned by the caller
anyway, because that is who inner root is outside. So the one case this cannot
map is the one case needing no mapping. `unshare --map-auto --map-current-user`
is not a shortcut: it maps the subuid range to low inner ids while restic needs
identity. Tested.

Measured live, restoring grafana: failed chowns 1626 -> 12 (the 12 being the
caller's own files, correct), grafana.db back to 231543:1002, grafana up and
writing. Falls back to running the command plainly when there is no subuid
range, no newuidmap, or the namespace will not start.

scripts/dev/lp-userns-ownership-test pins all three ownership cases; verified
the old prefix fails it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 17:04:12 +01:00
librelad
1fa36abb63 backup: stop claiming restored files "are already owned correctly"
resticRestoreSnapshot forgives the un-mappable-uid lchown failures so a restore
is not aborted by them, and reported: "expected, they are already owned
correctly". That is true only for LibrePortal's own files, whose owner is the
backup user restic already runs as. It is false for container-owned data.

_resticUsernsPrefix maps the subuid range and root, but unshare takes one range
per option so the backup user's own GID is never mapped — and app data is
written as <container-uid>:<backup-user>. Every such chown fails with EINVAL and
the file falls back to <backup-user>:<backup-user>. Verified directly:
231543:231543 applies, 231543:1002 does not.

Observed on a 13-app restore: grafana's grafana.db is recorded as 231543:1002
and landed as 1002:1002, so grafana (running as 231543) could not write it at
mode 0640 and died with "attempt to write a readonly database" — under a restore
that reported success. 1626 of that run's 2086 failed chowns were grafana's.

This commit does not fix the mapping — that is the backup engine's ownership
handling rather than the first-run restore path, and the candidate fixes
(newuidmap multi-range maps, or restoring as root via a path-validated helper)
want a decision first. See docs/roadmap/first-run-restore.md §3.5. What it fixes
is the reporting: count the files and say plainly that container-owned data was
not reinstated and the app may fail to write.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 13:42:53 +01:00
librelad
c9779d6581 restore: create staging as the principal that writes to it
`restore system` reported

    ✓ Success System config restored to: /libreportal-system/restore/system-config

for a directory that did not exist. Nothing had been written — on the step the
whole restore ordering depends on, since the system config carries every other
backup location's credentials.

Restore stages through $SYSTEM_DIR, which the manager owns, but the thing that
writes into the staging tree is restic, and runBackupOp runs it as the container
user. Both call sites created the directory as the wrong principal, in opposite
directions:

  backupRestoreSystemConfig  runFileOp mkdir  -> container user; denied on the
                             0751 manager-owned restore_dir, and unchecked
  storageRestoreAppTo        runInstallOp mkdir -> manager; restic could then
                             not create anything beneath it

Restic reports a permission denial as "ignoring error ..." and still exits 0, so
the callers' success checks were satisfied either way.

libreportal-ownership gains restore-stage (creates it cowner:MANAGER 0750 —
owner writes, manager traverses to confirm and review) and restore-unstage
(removes it; neither principal can, so staging trees simply accumulated). Both
confine the path to one component directly under the restore/migrate area.
footprint_version 8 -> 9.

backupRestoreSystemConfig now verifies the tree landed as the user that wrote
it, because the manager cannot read inside its own staging directory.

Verified on a live install: system config stages 57 real files, and the
relocation branch of storageRestoreAppTo ran for the first time — speedtest
restored from a snapshot taken at /libreportal-containers/speedtest into
/libreportal-alt/speedtest via stage-and-move, staging cleaned up afterwards.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 12:41:21 +01:00
librelad
5c8876428b test: pin the CLI argv path, and document the third silent truncation
scripts/dev/lp-cli-argv-test builds stubs from the real invocation line in
init.sh and the real LP_CLI_ARGS line in start.sh, then pushes thirteen app
names through them — so editing either file is what makes it fail. Verified
against both regressions: dropping "$@" from the wrapper, and reading "$@"
instead of "${@:10}" in start.sh.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 12:22:18 +01:00
librelad
5b2d824aac docs: record the two silent no-ops the end-to-end restore run found
Both were checks whose failure mode was to not run, and both produced output
indistinguishable from a healthy report. Worth writing down as a shape rather
than as two bugs.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 12:16:48 +01:00
librelad
ef60cce98a feat(app): portable .lpapp export and import — phase 4
`libreportal app export <app>` writes one app to a single file;
`libreportal app import <file>` installs it here. This is the thing the
original request described as "upload or navigate to the backup file" — a
restic repository is not a file, but the want behind the phrasing is real.

The format is deliberately boring: gzipped tar of the app directory with
its .libreportal-manifest.json at the root. That manifest already records
size, images, volumes, databases and storage location, so import reuses
the phase-3 checks for free — refusing an app this version no longer
ships, or one that will not fit, before unpacking anything.

Export stops the app first. A tar of a running Postgres is a corrupt
Postgres, and a file that looks fine until you restore it is worse than a
refusal. tar runs as the owning user with --numeric-owner so container
sub-UIDs survive the round trip instead of being remapped through this
machine's /etc/passwd.

Import re-runs the normal install pipeline after unpacking, because the
compose still carries the SOURCE machine's ports, IPs and domains — that
pipeline is what re-allocates them here, and migrateUrlRewrite fixes the
host-bound CFG_* fields.

Documented throughout as a courier format, not a backup: no history, no
retention, no encryption. Importing under a different name is refused
outright rather than half-working — the CFG_<APP>_* namespace and compose
identities would all need rewriting, and `instance create` already
answers "a second copy".

Fixes a bug this surfaced: _appDirIntended did an indirect expansion on
CFG_<SLUG>_STORAGE without checking <SLUG> can be a variable name, so a
hyphenated or mistyped app name emitted "invalid variable name" and then
reported the misleading "storage location is not mounted" for an app that
simply did not exist.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 09:08:41 +01:00
librelad
6c89e430e1 feat(restore): preflight report — phase 3
`restore preflight <loc_idx> <host>` reads every app's manifest out of its
own snapshot (engineDumpFile pulls a single file without restoring) and
checks it against this machine before anything is written:

  * an app this version no longer ships is skipped — restoring one
    produces a directory that can never start, and looks like success
    until someone opens it
  * an app that will not fit is skipped individually, because filling the
    disk part-way through takes the apps that already landed with it
  * a manifest naming a storage location this machine lacks falls back to
    the default, and says which app moved where

The installer's restore path runs it and asks once before continuing.

Two bugs found by running it against the live repository rather than
reading it:

The CLI dispatcher calls handlers with NO arguments, so `shift 4; "$@"`
inside one operates on an empty list. `restore first-run bulk` has always
had this — a bulk restore silently received zero apps. Fixed at the entry
point: start.sh now captures LP_CLI_ARGS from "$@", and both call sites
use it.

And the wrapper fills unset argv slots with the literal string "empty"
(${5:-empty} … ${9:-empty}), so a trailing slot arrives as a five-
character app name rather than a blank. Filtering on -n alone let five
phantom apps through and reported each as "no longer shipped". Both call
sites now drop the sentinel. That also caps any explicit list at five, so
preflight discovers the host's apps itself when given none.

Verified against the live repository: 13 apps discovered and checked.
Sizes read "?" there because those snapshots predate manifests carrying
size_bytes — the intended graceful fallback, not a refusal.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 09:05:49 +01:00
librelad
3c2f8f0691 docs(roadmap): rewrite phases 3-4 for the installer-based restore
Phases 3 and 4 were written when the restore was going to be a WebUI
wizard branch. It runs in the installer now, so both change shape.

Reconciliation stops being a screen and becomes a preflight report. The
key realisation is that it can run BEFORE anything is written: every
app's snapshot carries its own .libreportal-manifest.json, and
engineDumpFile already pulls a single file out of a snapshot without
restoring it. So the installer can read all the manifests, compare them
to this machine, and print a verdict per app — skipping an app whose
template this version no longer ships, or whose data will not fit, rather
than restoring something unstartable.

Phase 4 is now the thing the original request actually described. 'Upload
or navigate to the backup file' does not match a restic repository, but
the want behind it is real: one file, one app, hand it around.
'libreportal app export/import' with a .lpapp (tar.gz of the app dir plus
its manifest) serves it directly, gets §3's reconciliation for free, and
gives the installer a third answer to 'where is your backup?'. Documented
as a courier format, explicitly not a backup.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 08:57:26 +01:00
librelad
d44ebf0ca7 docs(roadmap): the restore password has no safe channel to the host yet
Phase 1 is built. Phase 2 hit a blocker worth deciding rather than
silently working around.

The WebUI cannot run restic, so a password typed in the browser has to
reach the host. Both existing channels leak it. The task command string —
which is what the Backup page ALREADY uses for this exact field — lands in
a task JSON under frontend/data/tasks at 0644, world-readable, and shows
in ps while the task runs. A file in that directory does not work either:
the container writes as dockerinstall, the manager runs as libreportal,
and at 0640 the manager cannot read it (verified on the live box).

So this is an existing product-wide weakness that the restore branch
happens to surface, not one the feature would introduce — and the restore
case is its sharpest form, since that password is the key to every backup
the user has.

Recommends a one-shot secret drop: the ownership helper already solves the
mirror-image case (_webui_bind_access chowns MANAGER:cowner 0640 so the
container can read manager-owned files), so the reverse is a small,
well-scoped addition — a directory owned cowner:MANAGER 0730 that the
container drops a 0640 file into, which the manager reads once and
unlinks. Worth doing because it also fixes the Backup page.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 08:14:18 +01:00
librelad
69b62fda06 docs(roadmap): first-run New Install vs Restore from Backup
Proposal for making "I'm rebuilding my server" a first-class first-run
path. Recording it before building because the useful finding is how
little is actually missing.

The restore machinery is already there: locationAdd connects a repo,
restoreFirstRunDiscover reads it without touching live state,
migrateDiscoverHosts/Apps enumerate what is in it, backupRestoreSystemConfig
brings settings and credentials back, restoreFirstRunBulk restores many
apps from another host, migrateUrlRewrite fixes host-bound CFG_* fields,
and storageRestoreAppTo already handles a snapshot whose paths don't
match this machine. What is missing is the front door and one screen.

That screen is the reconciliation diff — a backup describes a machine
that no longer exists, and the failure mode worth designing against is
re-deciding those facts silently. Every difference is detectable before
anything is written: a storage location that doesn't exist here, an app
bigger than the target drive, domains pointing at the old host, ports
already taken, apps this version no longer ships.

Two things the doc is deliberately blunt about.

An encrypted repository cannot be opened with anything inside itself. The
location password lives in the system config, which is inside the backup,
so on a fresh machine the user must supply it by hand — that is what
encryption means, not a bug. It has to be asked for early, because a user
who never wrote it down does not have a backup and should learn that at
step 2 rather than step 5.

And "upload the backup file" doesn't match the engines: restic, borg and
kopia write to a repository, not a file. Local means navigating to a path;
remote means credentials. A genuine single-file import is a separate
feature (a portable per-app export built on the manifest) and shouldn't
be conflated with the backup engines.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 08:01:47 +01:00