A registered drive that is unplugged rendered through the same path as any
other candidate — a "needs care" badge, "free of" with no numbers on either
side, an empty meter. To a first-time installer that reads as two broken disks
the scan turned up, with nothing tying the card back to a drive they registered
and later unplugged. Say "not connected", name the path, and draw no meter: a
meter with nothing in it is a claim about free space nobody measured. The same
locations are withheld from the dropdowns, since the wizard cannot stat a
directory on a drive that is absent.
Both dropdowns now end in "Custom path…", for a NAS mount or an LVM volume the
disk heuristics never rank as a candidate. Validation goes through
validateStep(3) rather than a disabled button: the apply side already refuses a
relative or system path, but its refusal is to fall back to the system disk,
and that is indistinguishable from having chosen the system disk on purpose.
A typed path is not a registered location, so setup_apply registers it via
storageAdd — which is what keeps the empty-directory admission rule and the
fitness checks in play — named after its basename, so it reads as "nas" rather
than "location-3" in the placement menus.
libreportal-storage: accept the name the listing prints. remove matched id and
path only, so `remove location-3` failed against a row displayed as
location-3. Root-owned helper changed, so footprint_version 10 -> 11.
Expose window.setupWizard: the instance was local to a promise in the
orchestrator and unreachable from the console or a test.
lp-storage-custom-test drives the step in a browser. Two holes it found in the
tests themselves, both the shape it exists to catch — a check whose failure
mode is to not run:
- It counted the cards that say "not connected" and asserted over those.
Turn the feature off and the count is zero, every() over an empty list is
true, and the block passed having checked nothing. The expectation now
comes from the feed.
- Both browser tests exited 0 whenever the page returned nothing. Under sudo,
where chromium will not start, they reported PASS having asserted nothing.
They now probe with `lp-shot --url` and curl: if the WebUI answers HTTP the
browser is the only thing that can have broken, and that is a failure.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The dialog test caught the new option immediately, which is what it is for.
Updated for five backends, plus checks specific to Connect: it must be offered,
disabled, labelled so the reason is visible rather than just greyed out, carry
no credential field while unusable, and point at the free equivalent that works
today.
connect is left out of the per-type field-swap loop on purpose — a disabled
option cannot be selected, which is the behaviour we want and is asserted
directly instead.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Reported: the dropdowns in Add destination don't work. They rendered correctly,
reported as enhanced, and did nothing when clicked.
custom-select portals its popup into <body> at z-index 1200, chosen — as
forms.css says in as many words — to clear eo-modal at 1100. The wizard raises
its modal to 10000, because at 1100 a modal opened from inside the wizard
rendered behind the wizard itself. That fix silently broke the other invariant:
the popup then opened behind the dialog that owns it. Raise the popup with it,
scoped to the wizard so nothing else's stacking moves.
The test already asserted the select was enhanced, which was true and useless —
the control was enhanced, it just could not be reached. So it now hit-tests:
open the popup and ask what is actually on top at its own centre, then click an
option and check the value, the button label and the field group all follow.
Verified by removing the rule again: two checks fail.
That is the second time this pair has bitten (the modal itself did the same
thing earlier), so the rule and the reason now sit together in one comment.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Reported after looking at the step: the add button unstyled, the dialog missing
the fields a backup location actually has, and its dropdowns not working. Three
real faults, and one reason all three shipped.
* "+ Add destination" carried class .setup-add-domain, which I invented. The
real one is .setup-domain-add, so no rule matched and it rendered as a bare
browser button in the middle of a styled form.
* The dialog asked for name / type / host / user / path / password. A backup
location has SSH port and auth method (key or password — key is the default
and needs nothing typed), S3 access and secret keys, B2 account id and key,
and a path mode. It now asks for what each backend needs, with the wording
taken from the location config so the wizard and the Backup page describe
the same thing the same way.
* .setup-field styled input[type=text] and [type=email] but not [type=password]
or [type=number], so a credential field and the SSH port rendered unstyled
even inside a correct container.
Only the credentials go through the secret channel — SSH password, S3 secret
key, B2 account key. The rest is ordinary configuration and travels as itself.
The reason all three shipped is that I checked the step by querying the DOM and
never looked at it. Structural checks cannot see an unstyled control, and a
dialog is behind a click so a screenshot cannot reach it either. So:
lp-shot --eval <route> <js> run JS in the page and print the result
LP_SHOT_EVAL=<js> run JS before a capture — open a dialog, then shoot
and scripts/dev/lp-backup-dialog-test drives the whole thing in a real browser:
opens it, swaps every backend and asserts only that backend's fields show,
toggles SSH auth and asserts the password field follows, submits, and asserts
the credential is not left in the DOM.
Its styling check needed two attempts, which is the point of mutation-testing
it: "is the background transparent" passes for an unstyled button, because a
native button is grey rather than transparent. It now compares the control
against a bare <button> in the same parent, so "no rule matched" is what fails.
Verified: reintroducing the wrong class fails the test.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
