The dialog test caught the new option immediately, which is what it is for.
Updated for five backends, plus checks specific to Connect: it must be offered,
disabled, labelled so the reason is visible rather than just greyed out, carry
no credential field while unusable, and point at the free equivalent that works
today.
connect is left out of the per-type field-swap loop on purpose — a disabled
option cannot be selected, which is the behaviour we want and is asserted
directly instead.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Reported: the dropdowns in Add destination don't work. They rendered correctly,
reported as enhanced, and did nothing when clicked.
custom-select portals its popup into <body> at z-index 1200, chosen — as
forms.css says in as many words — to clear eo-modal at 1100. The wizard raises
its modal to 10000, because at 1100 a modal opened from inside the wizard
rendered behind the wizard itself. That fix silently broke the other invariant:
the popup then opened behind the dialog that owns it. Raise the popup with it,
scoped to the wizard so nothing else's stacking moves.
The test already asserted the select was enhanced, which was true and useless —
the control was enhanced, it just could not be reached. So it now hit-tests:
open the popup and ask what is actually on top at its own centre, then click an
option and check the value, the button label and the field group all follow.
Verified by removing the rule again: two checks fail.
That is the second time this pair has bitten (the modal itself did the same
thing earlier), so the rule and the reason now sit together in one comment.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Reported after looking at the step: the add button unstyled, the dialog missing
the fields a backup location actually has, and its dropdowns not working. Three
real faults, and one reason all three shipped.
* "+ Add destination" carried class .setup-add-domain, which I invented. The
real one is .setup-domain-add, so no rule matched and it rendered as a bare
browser button in the middle of a styled form.
* The dialog asked for name / type / host / user / path / password. A backup
location has SSH port and auth method (key or password — key is the default
and needs nothing typed), S3 access and secret keys, B2 account id and key,
and a path mode. It now asks for what each backend needs, with the wording
taken from the location config so the wizard and the Backup page describe
the same thing the same way.
* .setup-field styled input[type=text] and [type=email] but not [type=password]
or [type=number], so a credential field and the SSH port rendered unstyled
even inside a correct container.
Only the credentials go through the secret channel — SSH password, S3 secret
key, B2 account key. The rest is ordinary configuration and travels as itself.
The reason all three shipped is that I checked the step by querying the DOM and
never looked at it. Structural checks cannot see an unstyled control, and a
dialog is behind a click so a screenshot cannot reach it either. So:
lp-shot --eval <route> <js> run JS in the page and print the result
LP_SHOT_EVAL=<js> run JS before a capture — open a dialog, then shoot
and scripts/dev/lp-backup-dialog-test drives the whole thing in a real browser:
opens it, swaps every backend and asserts only that backend's fields show,
toggles SSH auth and asserts the password field follows, submits, and asserts
the credential is not left in the DOM.
Its styling check needed two attempts, which is the point of mutation-testing
it: "is the background transparent" passes for an unstyled button, because a
native button is grey rather than transparent. It now compares the control
against a bare <button> in the same parent, so "no rule matched" is what fails.
Verified: reintroducing the wrong class fails the test.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
